It’s always a pleasure to do a Podcast with a host who is thoughtful, understands the issues, and engages in meaningful dialogue instead of just mindlessly plowing through a list of prepared questions. Remarkably many fail to clear that bar. Alex Epstein clears it easily. My interview with him is here.
To read the comments on a post, or to add a comment, you can click on the title of that post.
Search:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Recent Posts
- Is This Too Cryptic?
- Harris’s 1922 Paths to Victory
- Degrees of Delusion
- Why We Need Price Theorists
- The Next Trump Cabinet
- The Next Democratic President
- Abortion and Public Policy
- The Tenth Time’s A Charm
- Specialized Markets
- Lead Exposure and Criminal Behavior
- How to Organize a Waiting Line
- How I Spent My Saturday — A Geeky Puzzle
- Pandemic Policy
- Economic Catastrophes
- Game Theory
Archives
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- June 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- January 2022
- October 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
I watches this excellent Power Hour video instead of 60 Minutes and am so glad I did. The ideas discussed in the video were a million times more illuminating than the banalities uttered on TV.
Hey Steve, great interview as usual. Question about covid policy, in your response to Alex you only focused on harms the individuals are doing to themselves (the 0.1% chance of death) and not the externality that comes from spreading covid to others, which seems to not be priced. This seems especially pertinent given exponential spread etc.
How would you handle this aspect of the question, should we account for this externality in policy or would you say something like “when you drive a car you are also putting other people at risk without their permission”?
Typing this quickly on my phone so forgive the typos and conciseness, but I’m about at the 20 minute mark where you were just talking about parking lots be forests basically and that no one preference over the other is not “morally superior.”
I mean a lot of this resonates with me. But… and this a big but… I think it would likely be morally bad to rip up the entire Amazon rain forest because it is critical for our overall life on earth. Scale matters here. Broad management of forest matters. Look at Madagascar: it could/would be in a world of hurt if it doesn’t manage its island forests properly. If people just burn burn burn endlessly in an artificial way that nature is not used to … it’s not just about the random parking lot vs random piece of forest. There are bigger issues at play. I won’t admit to knowing how to think about these properly. Again… for the random acre of forest down the street, to turn it into a parking lot, sure. But… I guess my point is there has to be someone at a bigger government level watching that we aren’t going to ruin something critical with the earth at the *overall* rate that the forests are being turned into parking lots or furniture etc. and by the way, you can just replant the Amazon rain forest if you cut it down too fast.
I should have proof read that before sending but of course the last sentence should read you *cant* just always replant the Amazon rain forest, especially if it’s torn down too quickly.
Very enjoyable, I might be listening to this guy even when he ISN’T interviewing Professor Landsburg! It was interesting to view the California forests as an “environmental threat”. Only downside was having heard a lot of the ideas before…but I’m not going to unread those books to keep interviews fresh!
On the vaccine point about it being much more efficient through the price system: I agree that the price system is almost always the best system for allocating scarce resources with sufficient execution time, but I think the government opted for a vaccine distribution system (at least in the UK where I live) that was less efficient wholesale because it was (to them) simpler and likely to be rolled out more quickly to more people. In other words, they knew that there is a trade-off, and they reasoned that everyone will be vaccinated quicker with a simpler roll out than if they tried to roll out a more complex, politically contentious price system that would have taken more planning.